|
|
|
Lars Bo Langsted: The Rules on Corruption in Nordic Legislation The aim of this article is double-sided. On the one hand it summarizes the rules on corruption in Nordic legislation. On the other hand, it focuses on the difficulties legislators face when creating restrictions against corruptionmore generally. Criminal legislation differs only slightly across the Nordic countries. All Nordic countries have signed the same treaties on corruption, thereby committing them to criminalize the same kinds of public, private and international bribery. The differences mainly arise from the fact that Denmark, Sweden and Finland, in accordance with the Criminal Convention on Corruption from the Council of Europe (ETS no. 173), have signaled a reservation concerning the criminalization of trading in influence. Norway has criminalized trading in influence in regard to both public and private bribery, whereas Iceland has criminalized trading in influence only when it comes to public affairs. The keyword in all countries is the word “undue”. Four examples are used to illustrate how legislation works in the different countries and how it is often unclear whether an advantage is “undue” or not. Finally it is argued that corruption is extremely difficult to handle by legislation alone. We all have sympathies and dislikes when it comes to the specific people we do business with. It is therefore important not only to criminalize as a remedy for regulation, but also to look to civil and other kinds of public law in order to avoid decision-making being biased by irrelevant elements. |
|
Minna Viuhko: Do We Always Have to Pay? Finnish Businessmen’s and Public Servants’ Apprehension and Experience with Corruption at the Border between Finland and Russia This article deals with corruption on the Finnish-Russian border, particularly on the border between Finland and the Republic of Karelia. The article is based on a Finnish-Russian study that was conducted in 2008-2009 with the following aims: to map out how Finnish and Russian authorities and representatives of cross-border companies define and understand corruption; to classify the types of corruption that are most common in connection with cross-border activities; and to describe interviewees’ experiences with corruption. The current article deals only with the Finnish results of the study. Focus is placed on similarities and differences between Finnish civil servants and businesspersons in regard to their definitions of, and attitudes towards, corruption. Interestingly, while these two groups share similar definitions of corruption, their attitudes towards corruption in practice differ significantly. |
|
Margret
Saemundsdóttir: |
|
Per Ole Johansen: Title in English: In the Shade of the Norwegian Icon: Four Examples of Corruption This article examines four municipalities of varying sizes that have been involved in cases of bribery and illegal gain by external business actors. Fraudulent invoicing and overcharging of the municipality were the modi operandi. It was the municipalities’ own employees that carried on the tradition and set the tone for this corruption, as opposed to employees of private companies who were, more or less voluntarily, junior partners. The article concludes with a discussion of the following themes and questions: Weak checks and controls are seen in many studies as interchangeable with causes of corruption; Municipal corruption in Norway is both traditional and modern; Can corruption in Norway be compared with that in Italy and, if so, what questions should be posed?; The municipality’s independence in Norway has become something of an icon, which is lauded in historical articles and celebratory speeches; The history of municipal corruption in Norway is still waiting for its author. |
|
Joakim Thelander: |
|
Pål Lagestad and Hild Rønning: Title in English: Common Sense or Knowledge-Based Practice? The Importance of Police Use of Legislation in Public Interactions The ways in which police officers involved in operative policing behave, exercise their authority and justify their actions can be decisive for how the public perceives and trusts them. In order to achieve a good public image, the police have to know the law and practice it well. A very important factor is knowledge of the law in the first place. In this article, we clarify some of the legal frameworks governing police interventions with the public. At the same time we would like to stress that the police’s use of so-called common sense and “gut-feelings” must be founded in the law. Furthermore, we would like to show what happens when police work isn’t sufficiently founded in the law and how this can influence the efficiency of ordinary policing. When the police do not give reasons for their interventions, it can be interpreted as a lack of respect. And this, in turn, can lead to confrontational situations. In conclusion, we examine police officers’ attitudes towards the law as a working tool in their public interactions and identify a frequent failure to learn from experience as well as an apparent culture of disinterest when it comes to expanding one’s knowledge. |
Summaries fra 97. årgang Nr. 2 - August 2010 |
|
Title in English: National Criminal Law and
Internationalization. |
|
Title in English: Long Term Forecasting of Prison Populations. |
|
Paul Larsson: |
|
Lene Aagaard Hansen, professor Svend Sabroe, Søren Johan Mikkelsen and
Annie Vesterby Charles Title in English: Medical Findings and Legal Outcomes in Cases concerning Sexually Abused Children The association between the medical findings in cases regarding reported sexual abuse of children and the legal consequences of these cases has never been described in the Danish research literature. In total, 426 girls and 56 boys were examined at the request of the police at The Forensic Institute in Aarhus between 1996 and 2002. As many as 162 girls and 11 boys had positive anogenital findings and 165 perpetrators were convicted in court. There was no significant correlation between |
|
Maria Libak Pedersen: |
|
|
|
Åsa Bergenheim and Jonas
Liliequist: “Honour and Respect your Father and your Mother”: Violence Against Parents by Adult Children in a Historical Perspective. Today, violent abuse of parents by their grown-up children is veiled in silence; but this has not always been the case. In 17th and 18th century Sweden, violent and verbal abuse of parents constituted a capital crime, and in the 19th century physical abuse of parents was still regarded as a serious crime. The turning-point came in 1864 when parental abuse was excluded from the new penal code as an independent category of crime – a first step on the road to the modern veil of silence. The aim of this article is to analyse today’s silence and violent abuse in the light history. In the long run this was a history of changing attitudes and meanings. While the children of early modern families were obliged by both law and religion to respect their parents as the fundament of society, the rise of the modern bourgeoisie ideology implied that families should be united by bonds of love and affection as a natural fact which didn’t need to be regulated by law. What was seen as sin and crime in early modern society was diagnosed as a psychological and social deviation in the emerging modern society. |
Summaries fra 97. årgang Nr. 3 - November 2010 |
|
Flemming Balvig, Helgi Gunnlaugsson, Kristina Jerre,
Leif Petter Olaussen and Henrik Tham: |
|
Magnus Matningsdal: |
|
Anne-Stina Sørensen: A Struggle between Theory and Practice In recent years the police and the police education have encountered a demand for the development of best practice strategies and methods. The aim is a professionalization of policing. This calls for cooperation between the police and academia, but this cooperation can be difficult and ischaracterised by limited mutual understanding and conflicting interests. It is argued that the organizational structure of the police and the way in which the police role is defined can be a hindrance to fruitful cooperation with academia and hence to the professionalization of the police profession. Similarly, the lack of police science as an academic discipline in Denmark, the low prioritisation of applied science, and the frequent inability of academics to effectively communicate ideas to the general public increase the difficulties that police have in seeing the relevance of science and research. |
|
Anders Danielsson: |
|
James Bonta: |
|
Nils Dalseide: |
|
Felipe Estrada: Violence as a (Suitable) Social Problem In Scandinavia, as in many other European countries, violence constitutes an important focus for the public and political debate on crime. Much of what is said in the public debate, and done in the field of criminal policy, stems from a perception that violence is on the increase. This paper challenges the view that violence is rapidly increasing. Instead it is argued that the way violence is viewed in society and the subsequent response to violent offending have changed, leading to a deviancy amplification spiral. The discussion highlights the role of neo-liberal policies and the media as actors and arena, respectively, in the creation of this altered reaction. |
|
Inger-Lise Lien:
This paper discusses gang prevention within the Scandinavian context. The paper argues for a holistic approach based on a thorough analysis of the causes of crime and the processes of gang formation so that these can be targeted on a micro, meso and macro level. Migration seems to be one of the macro-level conditions that proliferates and seeps down to the lower levels. There is a need for measures directed towards education at early ages. The psychological pain that comes from life in the gang, such as that manifested in traumatic stress disorders, must be communicated to the young. Family programs are essential in order to strengthen the family and social control. It is also important to prevent the processes of withdrawal that often take place in areas where gang problems are most serious. Police work should be guided by a deep understanding, sharp analysis and thorough knowledge of the community, and of gang members’ activities and lives, in order to provide relevant solutions in the form of arbitration and tension reduction, as well as deterrence. Nervousness among the police may trigger further tensions, such that the process of gang formation escalates. |
|
Per Ole Träskman:
This article deals with a development seen in some of the more recent judgments of the European Court of Human Rights. This development concerns a re-interpretation of human rights as being not only a protection of citizens against the encroachments of public authorities, but also as a principle that requires pro-active efforts to prevent infringements committed by one citizen against another. The decision in the case MC versus Bulgaria provides a good example for discussion. |
|
Gorm Toftegaard Nielsen: Is the European Court of Human Rights a Threat to the Fundamental Principles of Criminal Law? On the basis of the rape case, M.C. v Bulgaria in 2003, a critical analysis is made of how the European Court of Human Rights has developed its ‘interpretation’ of the Convention from being a protection of citizens against injustices committed by their nation states to a requirement granting victims a ‘human right’ to demand that their perpetrators be punished, or at least be subjected to criminal proceedings. As it stands now, the suspect and the victim each have their own ‘human right’ and can demand the same protection. The classic protection of legal certainty for the suspect can easily be eroded by this approach. |
|
Vagn Greve
Zero tolerance has become an influential political ideology. Therefore we have good reasons to reconsider the limits of criminalization, the judicial and administrative interpretation of provisions concerning minor infractions of law, and the sanctions applied to such. The author warns against the development and calls for a renewed respect for Rechtsstaat ideology. |
|
Dan Frände: Zero Tolerance and Trivial Offences This article discusses the relationship between the principle of zero tolerance and petty crimes. Zero tolerance implies a decree to tolerate a certain incident to the lowest extent possible. The article asserts that the principle is to be given a certain independent weight on the level of law application, though this should be restricted to the activity of crime investigation by the police. The principle is, however, clearly expressed on the level of criminalization. The legislators of today do not accept forms of conduct that they regard as dangerous, i.e., that have the potential to result in concrete damage. From this perspective, the legislator does not create types of petty crime. At the same time, the legislator is clearly aware that certain concrete acts are so trivial, that they ought to be sifted out at the earliest possible stage of the criminal process. A general law of sanctions of a non-criminal type is not needed either. |
|
Martin Borgeke: How can we Ensure Comparable Penalties for Similar Crimes? The author emphasizes the importance of the principle of legality when establishing the penalty for a crime. He describes how to achieve greater coherence and presents his views on the responsibilities of different authorities and actors. While the author sees the Swedish courts as fairly consistent, he argues that much more could be done to ensure equal penalties in equal cases. He highlights the Supreme Court’s responsibilities and the need to continually examine the quality of judicial work. The potential advantages of using computer-assisted techniques to harmonize crime penalties are explored. |
|
Bent Carlsen. Sentencing and Explanatory Memoranda This article concerns the relationship between the Parliament and the judiciary when it comes to questions of sentencing. How can Parliament express sentencing guidelines in the law or in explanatory memoranda to bills without inappropriately limiting judicial discretion? The article describes difficulties that have been faced by the judiciary when trying to find and follow Parliamentary guidelines in various cases that have given rise to uncertainty and different sentences in the three court instances. The author’s conclusion is that the Danish courts make every effort to follow sentencing guidelines handed down from the Parliament, but that it is often very difficult for the Parliament to give clear and precise guidelines without including acts that should be omitted. It will therefore often be preferable for all – including the Parliament – to leave greater discretion to the judiciary when handing down sentences in a concrete case. |
|
Lars Korsell and Paul Larsson: Organised Crime in the Nordic Countries Organised crime in the Nordic context could best be characterized by two extremes. On one hand, there are the ad hoc-groups that form to carry out criminal enterprises such as smuggling operations. These ad hoc-groups are flexible and collaborators can come and go depending on the projects. The ad hoc-groups are quite discrete and profit is their primary goal. On the other hand, there are the brotherhoods of visible and often provocative gangs. Identity and brotherhood are often more important for these outlaw bikers, street gangs and similar gangs than the criminal enterprise itself. The ad hoc-groups are more common and thus more central to the criminal markets than the brotherhoods, even though the latter get a lot of media and political attention because of their characteristics. The nature of Nordic organised crime grows out of broader societal traits. The level of corruption is low, and people trust the political assemblies, the authorities and the judicial system as a whole. Longstanding democratic traditions, also on the local level, and relative economic equality help to explain why organised crime is not a threat even if there are problems. |
|
Paul Larsson and Lars Korsell Organized Crime: Current Knowledge Much of our knowledge about organized crime is based on data from official sources. The police, courts and public officials are central contributors of information used in the media discourse and in research on organized crime. We raise the questions of what consequences this has and how we as researchers can deal with the fact that our data come from these sources. |
|
May-Len Skilbrei and Charlotta Holmström: Nordic Prostitution Policies: Do We See the Emergence of a Nordic Model? The prostitution policies implemented in the Nordic countries have gone through major changes over the past 15 years. A change that has drawn a lot of attention, both within the Nordic region and internationally, is the introduction of prohibitions against the purchase of sexual acts and services. Sweden, Norway and Iceland have introduced such prohibitions, and Finland has criminalised buying sex from victims of trafficking or persons involved in pimp-organised prostitution. The laws applied to prostitution have to be understood in light of how prostitution is defined and dealt with as a social problem, and their existence explained by ideological developments and developments in the prostitution market. The fact that several countries have implemented similar legal reforms does not mean that the Nordic countries have a consistent approach to prostitution. In this article we describe how prostitution is handled in the Nordic countries and discuss the question as to whether one can now say that there is a common Nordic prostitution regime. |
|
Claes Lernestedt:
Are there Degrees in Hell? On the Buying (and Selling) of Sexual Services This paper discusses – and partly questions – a recent development in Sweden regarding the buying of sexual services: Specifically, that the crime of buying has to an increasing degree come to be seen as committed against the seller. |
|
Jussi Tapani: The Icelandic Financial Crisis from a Finnish Perspective This article explores the financial crisis in Iceland from a Finnish perspective. First, I provide a short introduction to the economic context of the Icelandic financial crisis and give a simplified overview of its primary causes. Second, I describe the primary features of the Finnish banking crisis as it stood at the end of the 1980s and beginning of the 1990s. Third, I present important discussions from criminal law, criminology and criminal policy that emerged during the banking crisis in Finland. These experiences can be useful in understanding and evaluating the types of challenges that the Icelandic criminal justice system is likely to face in the future. The current article serves as a starting point in a larger research project dealing with the complex relationship between financial systems, the criminal law and moral philosophy. |
|
Jon Petter Rui:
Ne bis in idem means «not twice for the same». The ne bis in idem-principle is implemented in the criminal procedural laws of all Nordic countries. As opposed to other legal systems, the principle has not been considered as a basic human right, but more as a technical, procedural principle. This has, however, changed due to the ratification and incorporation of Protocol No. 7 of the European Convention on Human Rights. Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 sets out the ne bis in idem-principle on a national level. This paper analyses the implementation of Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 in the Nordic countries. Perhaps surprisingly, substantial differences are revealed. In addition, the paper analyses the impact of the ne bis in idemprinciple in the Schengen Convention Article 54 in the Nordic countries. Both the force of this principle towards harmonization on the European level and the dynamic and evolutive interpretation of the principle at the European Court of Justice raise serious questions in regard to the future of Nordic cooperation in criminal matters. |
|
Petter Asp: Ne Bis in Idem: Not Twice for the Same This article on the principle of ne bis in idem focuses on two main questions: (1) the relationship between the application of the principle in national (i.e., within state) and international (i.e., between states) contexts, and (2) the application of article 4 protocol 7 of the European Convention of Human Rights in relation to the Swedish system, which provides for the possibility of using parallel sanctions (administrative and penal) for specific offences. |